Pluristem’s Phase I/II Muscle Injury Trial Shows that Placental Stem Cells Augment Muscle Healing After Surgery


Pluristem Therapeutics Inc. a leading developer of placenta-based cell therapies, has announced top-line results from its Phase I/II clinical trial that accesses the safety and efficacy of PLacental eXpanded (PLX-PAD) cells in the treatment of muscle injury. This clinical trial showed that PLX-PAD cells were safe and effective. These results provide evidence that PLX cells may be efficacious in the treatment of orthopedic injuries including muscles and tendons.

This Phase I/II trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study conducted at the Orthopedic Clinic of the Charité University Medical School under the auspices of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (PEI), Germany’s health authority. The injured muscle studied was the gluteus medius muscle in the buttock. Hip-replacement patients undergo a surgical procedure that injuries the gluteus medius muscle healing of this muscle after hip replacement surgery is crucial for joint stability and function.

Gluteal Muscles

The 20 patients in the study were randomized into three treatment groups. Each patient received an injection in the gluteal muscle that had been traumatized during surgery. One group was treated with 150 million PLX-PAD cells per dose (n=7), the second was administered 300 million PLX-PAD cells per dose (n=6), and the third received placebo (n=7).

The primary safety endpoint was clearly met since no serious adverse events were reported at either dose level. The study showed that PLX-PAD cells were safe and well tolerated.

The primary efficacy endpoint of the study (how well the stem cells worked) was the change in maximal voluntary isometric contraction force of the gluteal muscle at six months after surgery. Efficacy was shown in both PLX-PAD-treated patient groups. The group that received a dose of 150 million cells showed a statistically significant 500% improvement over the placebo group in the change of the maximal contraction force of the gluteal muscle (p=0.0067). Patients who received the lower dose (300 million cells) showed a 300% improvement over the placebo (p=0.18).

An analysis of the overall structure of the gluteal muscle using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated an increase in muscle volume in those patients treated with PLX-PAD cells versus the placebo group. The patients who had received the 150 million cell dose displayed a statistically significant superiority over the placebo group. Patients treated at the 150 million cell dose showed an approximate 300% improvement over the placebo in the analysis of muscle volume (p=0.004). Patients treated at the 300 million cell dose showed an approximate 150% improvement over the placebo in the change of muscle volume (p=0.19).

The study’s Senior Scientist, Dr. Tobias Winkler of the Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Julius Wolff Institute Berlin, Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany, commented, “I am very impressed with the magnitude of the efficacy results seen in this trial. PLX cells demonstrated safety and suggested that the increase in muscle volume could be a mechanism for the improvement of contraction force.”

Zami Aberman Chairman and CEO stated, “This was a very important study not only for Pluristem but for the cell therapy industry in general. The study confirms our pre-clinical findings that PLX-PAD cell therapy can be effective in treating muscle injury. Having a statistically significant result for our primary efficacy endpoint is very encouraging and consistent with our understanding of the mechanism of action associated with cell therapy. Based on these results, we intend to move forward with implementing our strategy towards using PLX cells in orthopedic indications and muscle trauma.”

Finding the Optimal Spot for Stem Cell Injections In Spinal Cord Injured Patients


A gaggle of laboratory animal experiments and clinical studies in human patients have established that stem cell injections into the spinal cord after spinal cord injury promote functional recovery (see Beattie, M. S., et al., Exp. Neurol. 148(2):453‐463; 1997; Bennett, D. L., et al., J. Neurosci. 20(1):427‐437; 2000; Kim HK, et al., PLos One 4(3): e4987 2009; Lu, P.; Tuszynski, M. H. Exp. Neurol. 209(2):313‐320; 2008; McTigue, D. M., et al., J. Neurosci. 18(14):5354-5365; 1998; Widenfalk, J.; Lundströmer, K. J. Neurosci. 21(10):3457‐3475; 2001; also see Salazar DL, et al., PLoS ONE, August 2010; Hooshmand M, et al., PLoS ONE, June 2009; Cummings BJ, et al., Neurological Research, July 2006; and Cummings BJ, et al., PNAS, September 19, 2005).  Stem Cell, Inc., for example, has conducted several tests with human patients using their HuCNS-SC human neural stem cell line, and transplantation of these stem cells promotes functional recovery in human patients who have suffered spinal cord injury.

However, one factor that has yet to be properly determined is the best site for stem cell injection. Previous work by scientists at the Keio University School of Medicine in Japan has shown that injection of neural stem cells and neural progenitor cells (NS/PCs) into non-injured sites by either intravenous or intrathecal (introduced directly into the space under the arachnoid membrane of the brain or spinal cord) administration failed to produce sufficient engraftment of stem cells at the site of injury.

Arachnoid space

Instead cells were trapped in the lungs and kidneys, and many mice even developed fatal lung conditions as a result of intravenous administration (see Takahashi Y., et al., Cell Transplant. 2011;20(5):727-39). These data convinced them that intralesional application of the stem cells (injections directly into the damaged site of the spinal cord) might be the most effective and reliable method for NS/PC tranplantations.

A new study by the Keio group has attempted to ascertain the efficacy of the intralesional injections. Mice with spinal cord injuries were injected with NS/PCs that had been derived from mice that expression glowing proteins. This allowed the injected cells to be tracked with bio-luminescence imaging (BLI).

The principal investigator of this research is Masaya Nakamura from the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at the Keio University School of Medicine. Dr. Nakamura and his team gave mice spinal contusions at the level of the tenth thoracic vertebra. Then some mice were given low doses and others high doses of NS/PCs that were derived from fetal mice (for those who are interested, low dose – 250,000 cells per mouse; high dose – 1 million cells per mouse) nine days after spinal cord injury. These mice were further divided into two groups: those injected at the lesion epicenter (E), those injected at sites at the front and back of the lesion (RC for “rostral/caudal”). Thus there were four groups total: High dose E, High dose RC, Low dose E, and Low dose RC.

All four groups showed better functional recovery than the control group, which was injected with phosphate buffered saline. BLI showed that the number of cells that survived in each of the four cell-transplanted groups was about the same across these groups.  Thus injecting more cells does not lead to greater numbers of surviving neural stem cells.  This makes sense, since the damaged spinal cord in  very inhospitable place for transplanted cells.

However, when the mice were examined for the expression of particular brain-derived neurotropic factors, the expression of such genes was higher in the RC-injected mice than in the E-injected mice. These results seems to explain why the transplanted NS/PCs differentiated more readily into neurons in the RC-injected mice rather than a type of glial cell known as an astrocyte, as was the case in the E-injected mice.

Human Astrocytes
Human Astrocytes

Nakamura and his team interpreted these results to mean that the environments of the E and RC sites can both support the survival of transplanted NS/PCs during the sub-acute phase of spinal cord injury. The authors conclude with a practical note: “Therefore, we conclude that it is optimal to graft a certain threshold number of NS/PCs into the epicenter lesion during the sub-acute phase of SCI, and thereby avoid causing further iatrogenic injury to the intact RC regions of the spinal cord.”

Hopefully Nakamura’s work will be translated into further human clinical trials. One feature of this study is that a particular threshold of stem cells survive when injected into the spinal cord and injecting larger numbers of cells does not increase the number of surviving cells. Injecting more cells might only contribute to the cell debris in the spinal cord. This is certainly a good thing to know when conducting clinical trials with neural stem cells in spinal cord-injured patients.