Cardiospheres Aid Heart Healing by Secreting Endoglin and Inhibiting TGF-beta signaling


Eduardo Marbán from Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute in Los Angeles and his team have invested a great deal of work into the development of cardiospheres, which are self-assembling heart-derived stem cells that grow as little balls of cells in culture. Several preclinical experiments and a few clinical trials have established the effectiveness of cardiospheres are treatments for the heart after a heart attack. However, Marbán and his co-workers have also worked very hard at determining why cardiospheres heal a damaged heart.

Cardiospheres
Cardiospheres in culture

 

To that end, Marbán and others have returned to their mouse model to do very detailed experiments with their cardiospheres and define exactly why these cells help heal the heart. To date, it is clear that cardiospheres increase the density of blood vessels in the heart tissue, decrease scar deposition, and prevent heart remodeling (the enlargement of the heart after a heart attack to compensate for the increase load placed on smaller amount of heart tissue). Marbán and others wanted to know precisely how cardiospheres managed these feats.

It has been known for some time that scar formation in the heart is largely a consequence of the activation of the TGF-beta signaling pathway (see NG Frangogiannis, Circulation Research 110: 159-173). Inhibition of this pathway can prevent the scar-making cells (fibroblasts) from migrating to the site of damage, dividing, and depositing the protein collagen, which is the main component of heart scars.

An abundant literature on heart scars show that the heart scar plays an important short-term role, but that in the long-run, it prevents the heart from resuming full function because it does not communicate with the rest of the heart muscle cells and does not contract. Therefore, helping the heart get through the first month after the heart attack without a scar is a crucial time.

In a recent paper published by Marbán and his team, cardiospheres were tested in culture and in the heart of mice that had suffered a heart attack. Marbán thought that since the cardiospheres were attenuating scar formation, they must be inhibiting TGF-beta signaling. TGF-beta proteins are secreted by cells and they bind to a receptor complex that then activate intracellular proteins called “SMADs.” These activated SMAD proteins enter the nucleus and activate the transcription of target genes.

TGF-beta signaling

In his co-culture experiments, Marbán and others used normal human fibroblasts from the lower layers of human skin and cultured them with and without cardiospheres. The co-culturing experiments showed that without cardiospheres, the dermal fibroblasts made lots of collagen and activated their internal SMAD proteins. When these human dermal fibroblasts were incubated with cardiospheres, their SMAD proteins were largely inactivated and they made very little collagen.

Such a result is not surprising, but how are the cardiospheres doing this? As it turns out, there is an inhibitor of the TGF-beta receptor complex called “endoglin” that can also be secreted known as sE. When Marbán and others examined their cardiospheres, they were secreting a fair amount of sE.

Thus, the production of sE could definitely prevent dermal fibroblasts from activating their SMADs and making collagen, but what if these sE molecules were inactivated? Marbán and others made antibodies against sE and then used them to inactivate the sE made in culture by the cardiospheres. Under such conditions, the cardiospheres no longer were able to prevent SMAD activation in dermal fibroblasts and the fibroblasts made lots of collagen, even in the presence of cardiospheres.

This is all fine and good, but it is in cell culture, and cell culture experiments must always be confirmed by experiments in a living creature. Therefore, Marbán and his colleagues used cardiospheres to treat mice that had suffered a heart attack. As observed before, the cardiosphere-treated mice showed increases in ejection fraction and fractional shortening, and decreases in end-diastolic and end-systolic volume. The cardiosphere-treated animals also had much less scar tissue after one month and greater blood vessel density. Furthermore, the cardiosphere-treated mice did not show the maladaptive enlargement of the heart muscle cells seen in post-heart attack patients. When the heart tissue was assayed one month after treatment, it was clear that the cardiosphere-treated heart tissue showed increased sE expression and much less TGF-beta signaling. The downstream targets of SMAD activation were much less, and SMADs also showed less activation. Expression of the TGF-beta receptors was also decreased.

This paper shows that endoglin expression plays a key role in preserving and healing the heart after a heart attack. Would it be possible to give soluble endoglin to heart attack patients? This remains to be seen.

One caveat with this paper is that human dermal fibroblasts are similar but different from heart fibroblasts. While it is reasonable to suppose that these two cell types react in a similar way to cardiospheres, such a supposition must be rigorously confirmed experimentally.

A More Efficient Way to Make Induced Pluripotent Stam cells


Mark Stadtfeld and his colleagues at the NYU Longone Medical Center has devised a new method for making induced pluripotent stem cells that greatly increases efficiency at which these cells are made.

Induced pluripotent stem cells or iPSCs are made from mature, adult cells by mean of a combination of genetic engineering and cell culture techniques. In short, the expression of four genes is forced in adult cells; Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc or OSKM. The proteins encoded by these four genes cooperatively work to drive a fraction of the cells into an immature state that resembles that of embryonic stem cells. These cells are them grown in cell culture systems that select for those cells that can grow continuously and form colonies of cells derived from progenitor cells. These cell colonies are them repeated isolated a re-cultured until an iPSC line has been established.

Unfortunately, this process is rather inefficient and tedious, since less than one percent or so of the reprogrammed cells actually undergo successful reprogramming. Additionally, it can take several weeks to properly establish an iPSC line. Thus, stem cell scientists have been looking at several different ways to boost the efficiency of this process.

Stadtfeld and his coworkers tried to add compounds to the cultured cells to determine if the culture conditions could actually augment the efficiency of the reprogramming process. “We especially wanted to know if these compounds could be combined to obtain stem cells at high-efficiency,” said Stadtfeld.

The compounds to which Stadtfeld was referring were two cell signaling proteins called Wnt and TFG-beta. Both of these compounds regulate a host of cell growth processes. Stadtfeld wanted to try regulating both of these pathways at the same time, in addition to providing cells with ascorbic acid, which is also known as vitamin C. Even vitamin C is more popularly known as an antioxidant, vitamin C also can remodel chromatin (that tight structure into which cells package their DNA).

When mouse skin fibroblasts were treated with OSKM and a compound that activates Wnt signaling, the efficiency of iPSC derivation increased slightly. The same thing was observed if fibroblasts were treated with OSKM and a compound that inhibits TGF-beta signaling or vitamin C. However, when all three of these compounds were combined, OSKM-engineered fibroblasts were reprogrammed at an efficiency of close to 80 percent. When different cell types were used as the starting cell, such as blood progenitor cells, the efficiency jumped to close to 100 percent; a result that was also observed if liver progenitor cells were used as the starting cell.

Stadtfeld is confident that these dramatic increases in iPSC derivation should improve future studies with iPSCs, since his protocol should make iPSC derivation more predictable. “It’s just a lot easier this way to study the mechanisms that govern reprogramming, as well as detect any undesired features that might develop in iPSCs,” he said.

Vitamin C and the two compounds used to manipulate the Wnt and TGF-β pathways have been widely used in research and have few unknown or hazardous effects. However, OKSM has in some cases caused undesired features in iPSCs, such as increased mutation rates. Stadtfeld believes that by making iPSC induction more rapid and efficient, his new technique might also make the resulting stem cells safer. “Conceivably it reduces the risk of abnormalities by smoothening out the reprogramming process,” Dr. Stadtfeld says. “That’s one of the issues we’re following up.”

Identifying Barriers to Cell Reprogramming


A new study from the laboratory of Miguel Ramalho-Santos, associate professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), might lead to a faster way to derive stem cells that can be used for regenerative therapies.

Induced pluripotent stem cells or iPSCs, which are made from adult cells by means of genetic engineering and cell culture techniques, behave much like embryonic stem cells. These adult cell-derived stem cells are pluripotent and can be differentiated into heart, liver, nerve and muscle cells. This present work by Ramalho-Santos and his colleagues builds upon the reprogramming protocols that have been developed to de-differentiate mature adults cells into iPSCs.

Ramalho-Santos and his co-workers have been interested in understanding the reprogramming process more completely in order to increase the efficiency and safety of this process. In particular, the Ramalho-Santos laboratory has been examining the cellular barriers that prevent adult cells from being reprogrammed in order to circumvent them and increase the efficiency of stem-cell production. In this present work, Ramalho-Santos’ group identified many of these cellular barriers to reprogramming.

“Our new work has important implications for both regenerative medicine and cancer research,” said Ramalho-Santos, who is also a member of the Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research at UCSF.

In 2012, Shinya Yamanaka from Kyoto University won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of iPSCs. Yamanaka discovered ways to turn back the clock on adult cells, but the protocol that he developed and others have used for years is inefficient, slow, and tedious. The percentage of adult cells successfully converted to iPS cells is usually rather low, and the resultant cells often retain traces of their earlier lives as mature, fully-differentiated cells.

To make iPSCs, researchers force the expression of pluripotency-inducing genes in adult cells. These four genes (Oct4, Klf4, Sox2, cMyc) have become known as the so-called “Yamanaka factors” and they work to turn back the clock on cellular maturation. However, as Ramalho-Santos explained: “From the time of the discovery of iPS cells, it was appreciated that the specialized cells from which they are derived are not a blank slate. They express their own genes that may resist or counter reprogramming.”

So what are those barriers? Ramalho-Santos continued: “Now, by genetically removing multiple barriers to reprogramming, we have found that the efficiency of generation of iPS cells can be greatly increased.” This discovery will contribute to accelerating the production of safe and efficient iPSCs and other types of other reprogrammed cells, according to Ramalho-Santos.

Instead of identifying individual genes that act as barriers to reprogramming, Ramalho-Santos and others discovered that sets of genes acted in combination to establish barriers to reprogramming. “At practically every level of a cell’s functions there are genes that act in an intricately coordinated fashion to antagonize reprogramming,” Ramalho-Santos explained. These existing mechanisms probably help mature, adult cells maintain their identities and functional roles. Ramalho-Santos explained it this way: “Much like the Red Queen running constantly to remain in the same place in Lewis Carroll’s ‘Through the Looking-Glass,’ adult cells appear to put a lot of effort into remaining in the same state.” Ramalho-Santos also added that apart from maintaining the integrity of our adult tissues, the barrier genes probably serve important roles in other diseases, including in the prevention of certain cancers

To identify these barriers, Ramalho-Santos and his team had to employ cutting-edge genetic, cellular and bioinformatics technologies. They collaborated with other UCSF labs headed by Jun Song, assistant professor of epidemiology and biostatistics, and Michael McManus, associate professor of microbiology and immunology.

They conducted genome-wide RNAi screens that revealed known and novel barriers to human cell reprogramming. Of these, a protein called ADAM29 antagonizes reprogramming as does clathrin-mediated endocytosis, which antagonizes reprogramming by enhancing TGF-β signaling. Also it became apparent that different barrier pathways have a combined effect on reprogramming efficiency. Additionally, genes involved in transcription, chromatin regulation, ubiquitination, dephosphorylation, vesicular transport, and cell adhesion also act as barriers to reprogramming.

Barriers to reprogramming

The hopes are that this knowledge will produce iPSCs faster that are safer to use and differentiate more completely.

Laser-Activation of Dental Stem Cells Spurs Dentine Regeneration


A variety of experiments, clinical trials, and strategies have attempted to exploit stem cells as therapeutic agents in regenerative medicine. However, once stem cells are removed from their niches within the body and grown in artificial culture systems their properties can change. Such culture-acquired changes can often compromise the therapeutic potential of some stem cells. For this reason, the development of relatively simple but effective stem cell isolation and manipulation techniques represents someone of the prominent technical hurdles to the clinical use of stem cells.

Several laboratories have used exogenous factors to direct the differentiation of tissue-resident stem cells, but these exogenous factors can often cause unwanted side effects. For this reason, simpler manipulation techniques are always a welcome addition to the armamentarium of stem cell scientists.

To that end, Ashok B. Kulkarni from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research in Bethesda, MD and David J. Mooney from the Harvard School of Engineering and their colleagues and co-workers have used non-ionizing, low-power laser (LPL) treatments to activate host stem cells and promote tissue regeneration. This is a minimally invasive treatment that directs stem cells already present in tissues to heal damaged tissues.

LPL treatment was used to activate human dental stem cells in a laboratory culture system. Upon LPL treatment, the dental stem cells began to synthesize a powerful growth factor called transforming growth factor–β1 (TGF-β1). The endogenous synthesis of TGF-β1 and its receptor drove the dental stem cells to form dentin tubes.

When Kulkami and Mooney used an assay in animals called a “pulp capping model,” they discovered that LPL-activated dental stem cells were able to regenerate dentin after laser activation. To further demonstrate that these regenerative effects were the result of TGF-β1, Kalkami and Mooney and others made cells that did not have a functional TGF-β receptor II. This mutation completely abrogated the effects of LPL treatments. Also, if the dental stem cells were incubated with a TGF-βRI inhibitor, the effects of LPL on the dental stem cells was attenuated.

Thus, there is a simple and non-invasive way to activate a resident stem cell population in our bodies. Furthermore, the mechanisms by which LPL activates these stem cells has been defined as TGF-β mediated. These experiments also outlines the mechanism by which resident stem cells might be harnessed by means of light-activated endogenous cues for clinical regenerative applications. Exciting, huh?