Using Light to Guide T Lymphocytes to Attack Tumors

Solid tumors have a whole bag of tricks to avoid the immune system. Fortunately, new therapies aim at these strategies to sensitize the patient’s immune system to the tumor. A new study from the University of Rochester Medical Center laboratory has discovered a simple, practical way that uses light and optics to turn killer immune cells to the tumors.

The lead author of this study, Minsoo Kim, Ph.D., works as a professor of Microbiology and Immunology, and is also an investigator at the Wilmot Cancer Institute. This work from Kim’s laboratory were published in the online journal Nature Communications. Kim described the method devised in his laboratory as similar to “sending light on a spy mission to track down cancer cells.”

A new therapy for treating hard-to-crack cancers is called immunotherapy. Immunotherapy does not utilize radiation or chemotherapy, but instructs the patient’s T lymphocytes to attack the cancerous cells. For example, CAR T-cell therapy removes the patient’s T cells, grows them in the laboratory, genetically engineers them to recognize, attack and kill the cancer, and then reintroduces these cells back into the patient. This is one type of immunotherapy. While this ingenuous technique shows remarkable promise, the immune system can overreact or under-react sometimes. Also, slippery cancers can find ways to hide from marauding T cells. Likewise, aggressive tumors often have mechanisms by which they suppress the immune system and surround themselves with a kind of “no-go” zone that prevents any immune cells from coming near the tumor. These immunosuppressive microenvironments that surround the malignant tumor keeps T cells out.

While it is true that T cells can be engineered to be more efficient killers, unleashing such supercharged T cells into the body can produce a tempest of toxicities. Is there a safer way?

Kim and his colleagues tried to find a kinder, gentler way to crack the tumor. They used a two-prong approach. First, Kim and others discovered that light-sensitive molecules could effectively guide T cells toward tumors. Kim and his coworkers even discovered that a molecule from algae called “channelrhodopsin” (CatCh) that is light-sensitive, could be introduced into immune cells by genetically engineering them with viruses. This technology is so novel that the university’s technology transfer office has filed for patent protection on the invention. Secondly, Kim collaborated with University of Rochester optics and photonics experts to design a Light Emitting Diode (LED) chip that could be implanted and shine light on the tumor.

Next, the Kim group fitted their mice with a small battery pack that sent a wireless signal to the implanted LED chip. When the ears of the mice were implanted with aggressive melanoma cells taken from a patient, the chip remotely shines light on the implanted tumor and surrounding areas. The light-guided T cells ran headlong to the tumor, ignoring the no-go zone where they killed the implanted tumor.

Even more interestingly, the LED chip with the battery pack were used in many control mice and no toxic side effects were observed. In the tumor-implanted mice, the light-guided T cells completely destroyed the implanted melanoma was destroyed without dangerous side effects.

In the future, Kim wants to determine if the wireless LED signal can deliver light to tumors deep within the body instead only on the surface. Also, can light shined into deep areas of the body still guide the T cells to the tumor to attack the tumor.

Kim cautiously emphasized that while his discovery is exciting, it is only meant to be combined with immunotherapy to make it safer, more effective, and traceable. Perhaps with additional improvements, Kim’s optical method might allow doctors to see, in real-time, if cancer therapies are reaching their target. Currently when patients receive immunotherapy, they must wait for several weeks and then have imaging scans to determine if the treatment worked.

“The beauty of our approach is that it’s highly flexible, non-toxic, and focused on activating T cells to do their jobs,” Kim said.

Making Blood Cells in Culture – Done


One of the “Holy Grails” of stem cell biology has been growing blood cells in culture for use in clinical settings. Such a feat would provide large quantities of blood cells for post-surgical patients, or those with leukemia or other blood-based illness. The clinical applications are manifold and extensive.

Unfortunately, growing blood-making stem cells in the laboratory has proven to be a difficult task for even the most inventive and skilled stem cell laboratories. Nevertheless, several laboratories have been able to recapitulate the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into cells that have the capacity to form T-cells and myeloid (non-lymphoid) cells (see Kennedy, M. et al. Cell Rep. 2, 1722–1735 (2012); Ditadi, A. et al. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 580–591 (2015); and Elcheva, I. et al. Nat. Commun. 5, 4372 (2014)). Unfortunately, these experiments generated cells that were not able to engraft in the bone marrow of irradiated mice. Such an experiment is essential because radiation destroys the bone marrow of the mouse, and if a cultured cell is indeed and blood-cell-forming stem cell, then placing it into the bone marrow of irradiated mice should result in a functional restoration of the bone marrow. This, however, was not the case, which shows that whatever these pluripotent stem cells in these experiments differentiated into, they were not blood-cell-forming hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

Now, after a hiatus of almost 20 years, two different research groups have use two very different approaches to transform mature cells into primitive HSCs that are self-propagating and also form the cellular components of blood.

The first of these research teams was led by George Daley of Boston Children’s Hospital in Massachusetts. Daley’s group used induced pluripotent stem cell technology to reprogram adult human cells into cells that function as HSCs, even though they are not precisely like those found in the bone marrow in people. The second research team was led by Shahin Rafii of the Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. Rafii and his coworkers used direct programming to differentiate mature cells from mice into fully functional HSCs.


The Daley group isolated skin-based fibroblasts from adult donors and then reprogrammed then through a combination of genetic engineering and cell culture techniques. This technology is similar to that designed by Shinya Yamanaka and his colleagues at Kyoto University, for which Yamanaka won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2012.   Once these reprogrammed cells formed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), Daley and his group did something very creative. They inserted the genes that encode seven different transcription factors into the genomes of their iPSCs. Transcription factors are proteins that activate gene expression. Transcription factors do so either by binding specific sequences of DNA, or by tightly binding to other proteins involved in gene expression and activating them. The genes for these seven transcription factors (ERG, HOXA5, HOXA9, HOXA10, LCOR, RUNX1 and SPI1) are known to be sufficient to convert hemogenic endothelium (the cells from which HSCs develop) into HSCs.

After engineering their iPSCs with these seven genes, Daley’s group did yet another highly creative thing. Daley and his colleagues injected their modified human cells into developing mice. This provided the cells with the proper environment to differentiate into HSCs. Twelve weeks after injecting them into mouse embryos, the engineered iPSCs had differentiated into progenitor cells that could produce the full range of blood cells found in human blood. This included immune cells, platelets, and other types of red and white blood cells. These progenitor cells are, according to Daley, “tantalizingly close” to naturally occurring HSCs.

Rafii and his team made their mouse HSCs from mature mouse cells without going through an embryonic intermediate. The Rafii grouop isolated endothelial cells that line blood vessels from adult mice and genetically engineered them to overexpress four different genes (Fosb, Gfi1, Runx1, and Spi1). Upon culturing their genetically engineered cells in a culture system that mimicked blood vessels, these cells, over time, differentiated into HSCs.

For the next test, Rafii and others injected their cultures-derived HSCs into irradiated mice. These mice survived and showed a completely recapitulated bone marrow that produced immune cells, and all types of red and white blood cells, and lived than 1.5 years in the lab.

Rafii told Nature’s Amy Maxmen that his approach is like “a direct airplane flight, and Daley’s procedure to a flight that takes a detour to the Moon before reaching its final destination.” Rafii noted that how the cells are made matters when it comes to using them in the clinic. Every time genes are transformed into cultured cells, a significant percentage of the cells fail to incorporate one or all of these genes. Such cells must be removed from those cells that were successfully transformed. Genetically engineered cells also run the risk of having experienced mutations as a side effect of the genetic manipulation. If implanted into people, such cells might cause problems.

Daley, however, and other stem cell researchers remain sanguine about the possibility of making such cells in safer, more efficient and even cheaper ways that can be brought to the clinic. For example, Jeanne Loring from the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, CA has suggested that using techniques that cause transient rather than permanent expression of introduced genes might very well make such cells inherently safer. Loring also noted that the iPSCs had by Daley’s group are initially made from skin-based fibroblasts, which are easy to acquire and isolate, whereas Rafii’s method begins with endothelial cells, which are more difficult to gather and to keep alive in the lab.

“For many years, people have figured out parts of this recipe, but they’ve never quite gotten there,” says Mick Bhatia, a stem-cell researcher at McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada, who was not involved with either study. “This is the first time researchers have checked all the boxes and made blood stem cells.” Bhatia added: “A lot of people have become jaded, saying that these cells don’t exist in nature and you can’t just push them into becoming anything else. . . I hoped the critics were wrong, and now I know they were.”

So making blood cells and HSCs in the laboratory is possible.  Bring this into the clinic is going to be even tougher.

Repeated Administrations of Stem Cells are More Effective than Single Administration

After a heart attack, the heart can undergo several structural and functional changes. Even after oxygen delivery to the heart muscle has been restored, a temporary loss of contractile function can persist for several hours or even days. This phenomenon is called myocardial stunning and it can also occur in people who have undergone cardiovascular procedures or central nervous system trauma. Myocardial stunning seems to result from the release of toxic molecules by the dying heart muscle cells, and an imbalance in ions required for heart muscle contraction, such as calcium ions.

If the heart muscle remains deprived of oxygen for some time, then the heart muscle adapts to low-oxygen conditions and “hibernates.” Hibernating myocardium contracts very little, and has “battened down the hatches,” metabolically speaking, in order to survive. However, hibernating myocardium takes even more heart muscle cells off-line and further reduces the performance of the heart.

Reduced heart performance leads to the production of molecules by the blood-starved kidneys that enlarge the heart and further compromise its efficiency. This leads to congestive heart failure and death. The term for such post-heart attack heart disease is ischemic cardiomyopathy” and it refers to a heart after a heart attack that is deprived of oxygen in many places and has heart walls filled with dead tissue that struggles to properly supply to body with blood, and often deteriorates as a result of this struggle.

Several different cell types have been used in many different studies to treat ischemic (oxygen-deprived) heart disease. The results, though positive in many cases, only show modest improvements in most cases. Furthermore, clinical studies and pro-clinical studies in laboratory animals tend to produce inconsistent results in which some patients or animals significantly improve while others either fail to improve at all. However, all of these studies have one feature in common: the subject is treated with only one infusion of stem cells. What if only one treatment is not enough to properly heal the damaged heart after a heart attack?

Workers from Roberto Bolli’s laboratory at the University of Louisville, Kentucky have treated laboratory rodents with heart attacks with three doses of cardiac progenitor cells. These treatments were given 35 days apart and were compared with single treatments and placebo treatments.

In their paper, which was published in Circulation Research (DOI:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308937), Bolli and his group gave heart attack to 85 Fischer 344 rats, but 13 died one week after the procedure. The remaining 72 rats were split into three groups: vehicle only, single-treatment, and triple-treatment. The vehicle-only rats received injections of saline into their heart muscle 30 days after the heart attack, and then again 35 days later and then again 35 days after that. The single-treatment rats received an injection of 12 million cardiac progenitor cells into their heart muscle 30 days after their heart attacks, but then received injections of saline 35 days later and 35 days after that. The triple-treatment rats received an injection of 12 million cardiac progenitor cells into their heart muscle 30 days after their heart attack, and then another injection 35 days later and a third inject 35 days after that. Of the 72 rats that survived the laboratory-induced heart attacks, 9 died as a result of injections into the heart. Thus, 63 rats completed the protocol.

Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) are resident stem cells in the heart that can be isolated with small heart tissue biopsies (see Tang XL, et al., Circ Res 2016;118:1091-1105). They can differentiate into heart muscle, blood vessels, or other heart-specific cell types (See Parmacek and Epstein, Cell 2005;120;295-298). Bolli and his co-workers have shown that the infusion of CPCs into the hearts of laboratory rodents after a heart attack can improve heart function, but the CPCs do not engraft into the heart at a terribly high rate. Furthermore, the functional improvements in the heart of these rodent elicited by CPC implantation are long-term (see Circ Res 2016;118:1091-1105).

When heart function of the laboratory rats were assessed prior to the procedure, no significant differences were observed between any of the rats in the three groups. However, after the procedure, the hearts of those rats that were injected with saline continued to deteriorate throughout the duration of the experiment. This deterioration was functional in nature and structural.

Animals that had received only one injection of 12 million CPCs into the left ventricles of their hearts showed significant improvements over the saline-injected animals. These animals showed less dilation of the heart (lower end-systolic volume), their hearts pumped more blood per beat (stroke volume), better thickness in the damaged heart wall, and improved ejection fraction (average percentage of blood pumped from the left ventricle during each beat). These hearts also had smaller heart scars, great elasticity, and greater amounts of viable muscle.

While all that sounds great, the triply-injected hearts that received three injections of CPCs, showed even more robust and significant improvements in heart structure and function. Whatever the single injection of CPCs did, the triple injections did even better. However, it must be noted that even with three injections of CPCs, the level of engraftment of the injected cells remained poor.

To summarize these results observed in this paper, the 3 doses of CPCs 35 days apart resulted in increases in local and global heart function that were, roughly, triple that produced by a single dose. The multiple CPC administrations were associated with more viable tissue, less scar tissue, less collagen, and greater heart muscle cell density in the infarcted region. Still, the level of engraftment and differentiation of the injected cells accounted for <1% of total heart muscle cells.

Bolli and his coworkers believe that their work suggests that all clinical and preclinical trials should at least try multiple stem cell treatments in order to maximize the clinical benefit of the injected stem cells. Furthermore, Bolli and others suggest that the use of single injection protocols are the reason so many stem cell-based clinical trials have resulted in inconsistent and inconclusive results.

This study is a large preclinical trial that used large numbers of animals. The data are solid and the results are believable. My problem with the clinical implications of this study are as follows: A heart attack causes a good deal of inflammation in the heart that culminates in wound healing. Within 24 hours of the heart attack, white blood cells infiltrate the damaged area of the heart. Protein-degrading enzymes from scavenger neutrophils (a type of white blood cell) degrade dead tissue. The damaged cells degenerate, and collagen-making fibroblasts divide and lay down scar tissue. The initially-deposited collagen deposited in the wall of the heart is weak, mushy, and vulnerable to re-injury. Unfortunately, this is precisely the period of time (10-14 days after the heart attack) that patients feel better and want to increase their activity levels. However, this greater activity level can stress the heart and cause rupture of the heart wall. After 6 weeks, the dead (necrotic) area is completely replaced by scar tissue, which is strong but incapable of contracting or relaxing.

In light of this timeline, multiple injections of stem cells into the heart after a heart attack might very increase the risk of rupture of the heart wall. This is particularly the case if implanted cells secrete tissue proteases that degrade surrounding tissue. Thus, timing and dose will be extremely important in such multiple treatments. Too many cells can rupture the heart, treatments too early when the healing heart walls are sift and weak will prove inimical to the heart and treatments given too late might very well be too late for the cells to do any good. Therefore, while this paper seems to move the ball down the field of regenerative medicine, it creates a fair number of questions that will need to be answered before such a strategy can come to the clinic.

Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation Tests Stem Cell Combination in Heart Attack Patients

The Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation has announced a new clinical trial that will examine the ability of a stem cell combination to treat patients with ischemic heart failure.

In patients who have suffered from former heart attacks, clogged coronary blood vessels and heart muscle that hibernates can result in a heart that no longer works well enough to support the life of the patient. The lack of blood flow to vital parts of the heart and an increasing work load can result is so-called “Ischemic heart failure.” Such heart failure after a previous heart attack is one of the leading cause of death and morbidity in the world. According to the World Health Organization, ischemic heart disease affects more than 12% of the world’s population.

Stem cell therapy has been tested as a potential treatment for ischemic heart disease. Despite flashes of remarkable success, the overall efficacy of these treatments has been relatively modest. Most clinical trials have used the patient’s own bone marrow cells. In this case, the cell population is very mixed and it might not even be stem cell populations in the bone marrow that are eliciting recovery. Also, the quality of each patient’s bone marrow is probably quite varied, which makes standardizing such experiments remarkably difficult. Other clinical trials have used bone marrow derived mesenchymal cells [MSCs]. Several clinical trials with MSCs have seen some improvement in patients. MSCs seem to induce the formation of new blood vessels and also seem to induce endogenous stem cell populations in the heart to come to life and fix the heart. Other trials have used cardiac stem cells (CSCs) that were derived from biopsies of the heart. Even though fewer clinical trials have tested the efficacy of CSCs in human patients, the trials that have been conducted suggest that these cells can truly regenerate damaged heart tissue.

The Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation® (MHIF) has announced a new clinical trial which will examine the combination of MSCs with CSCs to treatment patients with ischemic heart failure. This clinical trial, the CONCERT study, will be led by Principal Investigator Jay Traverse, MD. The CONCERT study will implant MSC’s and CSC’s in order to determine if the combination would be more successful than using either alone based on pre-clinical studies in swine demonstrating an enhanced synergistic effect of the combination.

CONCERT is sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN), of which MHIF is a charter member. This will be a phase II clinical trial, which means that the focus of this leg of the study is to assess the relative safety of CSCs and MSCs, delivered either alone, or in combination, in comparison to placebo, and to measure the efficacy of the stem cell cocktail as well. To that end, researchers will measure and note any change or improvement in left ventricular (LV) function by cardiac MRI as well as changes in various clinical outcomes (survival, 6-minute walking, blood pressure, etc.), and quality of life.

This phase II study is a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study that will enroll 160 subjects at seven different CCTRN sites throughout the U.S. All recruited subjects will have ischemic cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction 5%). This is significant, because some work in animals suggests that CSCs can make new heart muscle tissue that can shrink the heart scar. The first 16 patients were recently enrolled in a FDA-required safety run-in phase, but the remaining patients will be enrolled in the fall after a three-month safety analysis is performed. Incidentally, this is the first cardiac stem cell trial to perform MRIs on patients with defibrillators and pacemakers

“This combination of cells represents the most potent cell therapy product ever delivered to patients,” said Dr. Traverse. “Confirming that both types of stem cells together work better than either individual cell type could lead to improved patient outcomes and better quality of life for ischemic heart failure patients.”

Dosing Recent Heart Attack Patients with G-CSF Doesn’t Seem To Work

Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)is a small protein that stimulates the bone marrow to produce more of a particular class of white blood cells called granulocytes and release them into the bloodstream. A commercially available version of G-CSF called Filgrastim (Neupogen) is used to boost the immune system of cancer patients whose immune systems have taken a beating from chemotherapy.

Because several clinical trials have shown that implanting bone marrow mononuclear fractions into the hearts of heart attack patients can improve the heart health of some heart attack patients, clinicians have supposed that injecting heart attack patients with drugs like filgrastim, which moves many bone marrow-derived cells into the bloodstream might also provide some relief for heart attack patients.

Nice idea, but it does not seem to work. Two clinical trials, STEMMI and REVIVAL-2, have given G-CSF to heart attack patients at different times after their heart attacks. Unfortunately both studies have failed to show a difference from the placebo.

In the REVIVAL-2 study, 114 patients were enrolled, and 56 received 10 micrograms per kilogram body weight G-CSF for five days, and the remaining patients received a placebo treatment.  G-CSF and the placebo were administered to patients five days after the hearts were successfully reperfused by percutaneous coronary intervention (this is a fancy way of saying stenting).  This study was double-blinded, placebo-controlled and well designed.  Unfortunately, when patients were studied seven years after treatment, there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and the placebo groups when it came to the number of deaths, heart attacks, and strokes.  Thus, the authors conclude that G-CSF administration did not improve clinical outcomes for patients who had a heart attack (see Birgit Steppich, et al, Atherosclerosis and Ischemic Disease 115.4, 2016).

A second clinical trial, the STEMMI trial, was a prospective trial in which G-CSF treatment was begun 10-65 hours after reperfusion.  Here again, there were no structural differences between the placebo group and the G-CSF-treated group six months after treatment and a five-year follow-up analysis of 74 patients revealed no differences in the occurrence of major cardiovascular incidents between the two treatment groups (R.S. Ripa, and others, Circulation 2006; 113: 1983-1992).

The STEM-AMI clinical trial also showed no differences in clinical outcomes after G-CSF treatment as compared to placebo in 60 patients after three years (F. Achilli, and others, Heart 2014, 100: 574-581).

Why does this technique fail?  It is possible that the white blood cells that are mobilized by G-CSF are low-quality and do not express particular genes.  A study in rats has shown that G-CSF infusion increases the number of progenitor cells in the bloodstream, but fails to increase the number of progenitor cells in the heart after a heart attack (D. Sato, and others, Experimental Clinical Cardiology, 2012; 17:83-88).  In order for cells to home to the infarcted heart, they must express particular proteins on their surfaces.  For example, the cell surface protein CXCR4 is known to play an integral role in progenitor cell homing, along with several other proteins (see Taghavi and George, American Journal of Translational Research 2013; 5:404-411; Shah and Shalia, Stem Cells International 2011;2011:536758; Zaruba and Franz, Expert Opinion in Biological Therapy 2010; 10:321-335).  Indeed, Stein and others have shown that progenitor cells mobilized with G-CSF in human patients lack CXCR4 and other cell adhesion proteins thought to play a role in homing to the infarcted heart (Thromb Haemost 2010;103:638-643).

Therefore, even though all of these studies have not uncovered a risk in G-CSF treatment, the consensus of the data seems to be there no clinical benefit is conferred by treating heart attack patients with G-CSF.

Hair Follicles Can Direct Wound-Based Cells to Induce Scar-Free Healing

News from the University of Pennsylvania reports a new method that involves the use of fat to help heal skin without the formation of scar tissue.  This work comes from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, and it is the result of a large-scale, multi-year study that collaborated with the Plikus Laboratory for Developmental and Regenerative Biology at the University of California, Irvine.  Their findings were published online in the journal Science on January 5th, 2017.

A fancy name for fat is “adipose tissue.”  Adipose tissue is actually a rather complicated pastiche of different cell types.  Specialized cells in adipose tissue that stores fat are called “adipocytes,” but they are more colloquially called fat cells.  Fat cells are normally found in the skin, but when wounds in the skin heal and form, those underlying population of fat cells are lost.  In skin tissue that is undergoing the process of healing, the most common cell types are known as “myofibroblasts.”  Myofibroblasts are large cells with ruffled membranes, that are kind of a cross between smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts.  They have the ability to contract like smooth muscle cells when exposed to molecules that induce smooth muscle to contract, such as angiotensin II or epinephrine.  Fibroblasts, which are numerous throughout the skin and other organs, can readily differentiate into myofibroblasts, as can stellate cells found in liver or the pancreas, some smooth muscle cells, progenitor cells in stromal tissue, epithelial cells, or circulating progenitor cells (see B. Hinz, et al, The myofibroblast: one function, multiple origins, Am J Pathol. 2007 Jun;170(6):1807-16).  Once it forms, scar tissue also does not properly form any hair follicles and this can give it a rather odd appearance relative to the rest of the skin. The Perelman researchers designed a new strategy to limit scar formation during healing by converting wound-based myofibroblasts into fat cells, which prevents the formation of scarring.

“Essentially, we can manipulate wound healing so that it leads to skin regeneration rather than scarring,” said George Cotsarelis, MD, the chair of the Department of Dermatology and the Milton Bixler Hartzell Professor of Dermatology at Penn, and the principal investigator of this project. “The secret is to regenerate hair follicles first. After that, the fat will regenerate in response to the signals from those follicles.”

Cotsarelis and his colleagues showed that the formation of fat in the skin and hair follicles are separate developmental events, but they are, nevertheless, linked.  Hair follicles form first, and the factors required to induce hair follicle formation that are produced by the regenerating hair follicle can also convert surrounding myofibroblasts into fat cells instead of a scar.  This underlying fat does not form without the formation of these new hair follicles.  These new fat cells are indistinguishable from pre-existing skin-based fat cells that give the healed wound a natural look instead of leaving a scar.  Cotsarelis and his gang discovered that a factor secreted by hair follicles called Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) instructs the myofibroblasts to become fat.  This single finding represents a tectonic shift on our understanding of myofibroblasts.

“Typically, myofibroblasts were thought to be incapable of becoming a different type of cell,” Cotsarelis said. “But our work shows we have the ability to influence these cells, and that they can be efficiently and stably converted into adipocytes.” This was shown in both the mouse and in human keloid cells grown in culture.

“The findings show we have a window of opportunity after wounding to influence the tissue to regenerate rather than scar,” said the study’s lead author Maksim Plikus, PhD, an assistant professor of Developmental and Cell Biology at the University of California, Irvine. Plikus began this research as a postdoctoral fellow in the Cotsarelis Laboratory at Penn, and the two institutions have continued to collaborate.

These new findings might very well revolutionize dematological wound treatments.  These data might be useful for developing therapies that drive myofibroblasts to differentiate into adipocytes that can help wounds heal without scarring.

As Cotsarelis put it: “It’s highly desirable from a clinical standpoint, but right now it’s an unmet need.”

However, wound treatments are not the only use for this work.  Fat cell loss is a common complication of other clinical conditions.  HIV treatments, cancer, scleroderma, are just a few of the diseases that can cause wasting and drastic weight loss.  Also, because fat cells are also lost naturally because of the aging process, especially in the face, which leads to permanent, deep wrinkles, something that available anti-aging treatments cannot satisfactorily address.

“Our findings can potentially move us toward a new strategy to regenerate adipocytes in wrinkled skin, which could lead us to brand new anti-aging treatments,” Cotsarelis said.

The Cotsarelis Lab is now examining how hair follicle regeneration can promote skin regeneration.  The Plikus Laboratory would like to know more about the role of BMP in wound healing and are conducting further studies with using human cells and human scar tissue.